The flood of humanistic (belief in man rather than God) philosophies in school textbooks is freely admitted by the humanists themselves. The following quote is from The Humanist magazine: “Something wonderful, free, unheralded, and of significance to all Humanists is happening in the secondary schools. It is the adolescent literature movement. They may burn Slaughterhouse Five in North Dakota and ban a number of innocuous books in Kanaway County, but thank God the crazies don’t do all that much reading. If they did, they’d find that they have already been defeated. Adolescent literature has opened Pandora’s box…Nothing that is part of contemporary life is taboo in this genre, and any valid piece of writing that helps to make the world more knowable to young people serves an important humanistic function.”

In recent years, in schools around the country – Planned Parenthood passed out “back to school packs” to middle school, junior high, and high school students. The pack contained items which had phrases with sexual connotations on it. It included a “ruler to measure size,” an “eraser for rubbing,” and a “pen for different strokes for different folks and orientations.”

Dr. Thomas Sowell, economist and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution wrote in 1993 in an article published by Forbes Magazine titled, “Indoctrinating the Children”, “The techniques of brainwashing developed in totalitarian countries are routinely used in psychological conditioning programs imposed on American school children. These include emotional shock and desensitization, psychological isolation from sources of support, stripping away defenses, manipulative cross-examination of the individual’s underlying moral values, and inducing acceptance of alternative values by psychological rather than rational means. These techniques are not confined to separate courses or programs…(and) are not isolated idiosyncrasies of particular teachers. They are products of numerous books and other ‘educational’ material in programs packaged by organizations that sell such curricula to administrators and teach the techniques to teachers. Some packages even include instructions on how to deal with parents or others who object…Stripping away psychological defenses can be done through assignments to keep diaries to be discussed in the group and through role-playing assignments, both techniques used in the original brainwashing programs in China under Mao.”

In 1973 in the February 10th edition of The Saturday Review of Education, NEA president (National Education Association) Catherine Barrett wrote that “Dramatic changes in the way we will raise our children in the year 2000 are indicated, particularly in terms of schooling. We will need to recognize that the so-called basic skills, which currently represent nearly the total effort in elementary schools, will be taught in one-quarter of the present school day. When this happens – and it’s near – the teacher can rise to his true calling. More than a dispenser of information, the teacher will be a conveyer of values, a philosopher. We will be agents of change.”

When teachers do attempt to take an honorable direction they face reprimand, and hate. Two years ago, Diane Lenning, president of the National Education Association’s Republican Educators Caucus and an Orange County, California, high school teacher, was targeted by liberal Republicans after she questioned the NEA’s honoring of Kevin Jennings, founder of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) as educator of the year. The caucus voted 31 to 18 to change the bylaws to permit her removal. Instead of removing the queer, they removed the woman who opposed him and gave the queer an award.

The American Library Association has produced “Bibliography for Gay Teens.” It is an annotated bibliography of fiction and non-fiction books appropriate for GLBT teen-aged readers. These books are available in most public schools.

The American Psychological Association provides training and resources for school health professionals. They have implemented the Healthy LGB Student Project other wise called “Healthy Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Students Project.” They describe Sexual Orientation as: “The structure of a person’s romantic, sexual, and/or emotional attractions. More specifically, a person’s attraction to persons of the opposite sex, persons of the same sex, or persons of both sexes. Notice here that they include “emotional attraction” as part of sexual orientation.

This aspect of “sexual orientation” is being used at the youngest ages to convince children that they may be queer if they have a close emotional bond with a child of the same sex. An example of this is the often repeated lie that Jonathan and King David in the Bible were homosexual lovers. This is said because the Bible points out the close friendship of the two men. They were closer friends to each other than to even any woman. This is the same close bond that often develops between soldiers in war time. Anything that the perverts can twist to their advantage – they do!

And finally direct proof of the brainwashing appears in an article in The Humanist magazine titled, “A Religion for a New Age,” we read: “The battle for humankind’s future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers who correctly perceive their role as the proselytizers of a new faith. The classroom must and will become an arena of conflict between the old and the new-the rotting corpse of Christianity…and the new faith of humanism.”


The Population Reference Bureau recently released their most current statistics regarding interracial marriage. Their data is current through the year 2000 – the latest year that figures are available. In their report they say, “Recent opinion surveys show greater acceptance of interracial romantic relationships, with majorities of respondents saying that they accept interracial dating and marriage. These shifts in public opinion are remarkable, considering that anti miscegenation laws were not overturned until 1967 and that, as recently as 1990, 67 percent of whites either opposed or strongly opposed a relative marrying a black person…In a 2000 survey , 38 percent of white Americans opposed their relative marrying a black person.”

According to the PRB, intermarriage will increase. The rise in intermarriage is credited to three things. 1)the overturning of anti-miscegenation laws in 1967. 2) the large-scale immigration of people from Asia and Latin America following changes to the immigration laws in 1965 and 3) the civil rights movement which included school desegregation and affirmative action that in turn placed whites and non-whites in continual day to day interaction via school and employment.

The biggest increase in intermarriage has occurred in recent years, due to the social interaction of children of different races in the school room. Obviously school busing, the promotion of interracial marriages by “Christian” preachers, visible images in all types of media, and 12 (plus) years of social conditioning in the schools for each and every child has had a devastating effect on the racial integrity of white America and our sister white nations.